Transitions used to be three phase:
- captureValues(): get all relevant property values in the
affected view targets
- setup(): set appropriate start values for affected views
prior to any transitions being played
- play(): create/play Animators for affected views
Now the second and third phases have been collapsed (and named
"play()"). This single step sets initial values for target views
and creates any Animators that should be played during the transition.
The transition mechanism stores these Animators and then starts
them at the appropriate time in the overall transition.
Issue #9507585 Transitions: Simplify Transition.play() design
Change-Id: I3fc67599b38fe49eee885dc5d32444db90b7703b
Previously, Fade transitions did not work correctly on hirearchies; they
only handled individual views. in particular, they would side-effect all
fading views by removing them from their parent to fade them out in the
overlay of the scene root. This worked for the fade-out transition itself,
but caused problems when those same hierarchies were added back in and
another Fade was run on the hierarchy, because now all of the views inside
that parent node had been removed, so they didn't fade in at all.
The fix was to add logic in Visibility to detect when a disappearing
view was inside a hierarchy that was also disappearing, and to skip the
fade on the views inside that hierarchy, leaving only the top-most
disappearing view to be faded out, thus preserving the hierarchy under
that faded-out group.
Along the way, there were various cleanups, fixes, and refactorings in the
transition code, and slight API modifications.
Issue #9406371 Transitions: Removing view hierarchy not working correctly
Issue #9470255 Transitions: Separate different transitions by Scene Root
Change-Id: I42e80dac6097fee740f651dcc0535f2c57c11ebb
Add TransitionManager.beginDelayedTransition() to handle starting a transition
on the next frame for a given scene root based on all changes that
take place between the first call to that method and the next animation frame.
Issue #9321937 Transitions: consider batching up multiple scene actions
Change-Id: I3fc92b6b4ec5ff42b1e678bcfd385703e32eba2a
The logic that canceled underlying animations caused a problem
when there were more than one animation in the list (due to removing
items from a list that was currently being processed elsewhere).
Change-Id: Ie207f340b5d7de4ffcf56a26c05ec394abb80224
setDuration() wasn't handled correctly for TransitionGroup; it should
propagate the value to its children.
Also, videos with no ids were not being handled correctly. The transition code was
using the default id on those views (-1) to store start/end data about the view,
causing multiple non-id views to clobber values in the hashmaps. The correct approach
should be to ignore default id values - only store information about the view
instances, not about the unset ids.
Also, added a new test InterruptTest to be used to fix the current behavior of
not handling situations where new transitions start while old ones are still taking place.
Change-Id: I4e880bdbb33cc26d487bceb0d56e463e72f7621f
This checkin has preliminary API (in flux, definitely changes still
to be made) and implementation for a new "Scenes & Transitions" feature.
The current implementation allows you to define different Scenes
(via layout resource IDs or callbacks) and Transitions to be used when
changing to those scenes. By default, scene changes will use AutoTransition,
which generally does the right thing.
There are no overview docs or tutorials yet. The best way to learn how things
work is to see the code for the various tests in
frameworks/base/tests/TransitionTests.
Expect the API to change. Expect the implementation to change (mostly to add
more functionality). Expect bugs, but tell me if things do not work
as expected.
Change-Id: Ib025a9f565678b225afa4759325cf6d496cc7215
