Bug 11291911
These deleted classes were previously public APIs and so need to remain
in the build (but hidden) in order to keep existing apps working.
(Partially reverts Change-Id: I02549a71104b35d86d99058c71f43e054730ec7d)
Change-Id: I28e53b056f41e66645136f5e18fba2ff55a65fe5
Although the IME windows are now allowed to extend into
the nav bar, some IMEs were making assumptions about
computed insets based on the height of the content view.
So our navigation bar view (opaque view blocking the nav bar
area to avoid the island effect when transparent) needs to live
above the content view in the hierarchy, making the content view
the same height as it was before.
A surgical spot to put the guard view is up at the root view
(PhoneWindow.DecorView). fitSystemWindows is always called since
this view is not recreated, and the layout is stable: waiting until
the IME is attached to the window is too late to add a guard view.
This is above the screen_* layouts, so will work without having to
touch all of them. And it only affects windows of TYPE_INPUT_METHOD.
Bug:11237795
Change-Id: I6a93f30aec83f1cecfb854073046cbc87ab4aa66
1. For an app to print it creates a PrintDocumentAdapter implementation
which is passed to the print dialog activity. If the activity that
created the adapter is destroyed then the adapter, which may rely on
the activity state, may be in an invalid state. For example, an app
creates an adapter and calls print resuting in the app activity and
the print dialog activity being stacked. Now the user rotates the
device which triggers the recreating of the activity stack (assume the
app does not handle rotation). The recreated print dialog activity
receives the intent that originally created it with containing the
adapter that was constructed in the context of the old, now destroyed,
app activity instance.
To handle this we are limiting an app to be able to print only from
and activity and when this activity is destroyed we mark the adapter
as invalid which will result in hiding the print dialog activity. Note
that if the app process is killed we already handle this in the print
dialog activiy by registering a death recipient on the adapter binder.
2. In the PrintManager.PrintDocumentAdapterDelegate some of the state is
accessed only on the main thread and some from miltiple threads. The
code was trying to avoid locking for state that is not accessed by
multiple threads but this is error prone and the benefit does not
justify the complexity and added fragility. Now grabbing a lock all
the time.
3. The PrintJobConfigActivity waits for it to bind to the print spooler
service before instantiating its print controller and editor. However,
these can be accessed by invoking some of the activity cycle callbacks.
This change is adding null checks for the case where the activity
callbacks are called before the binding to the spooler is completed.
bug:11242661
Change-Id: Id906b3170e4f0a0553772dfa62686f06fdca0eaf
Remove references to Java 7 class java.util.Objects and replace it with
a new class that can be loaded on Java 6.
Change-Id: Ibbd9b20b8bc89e247f1d0c48d743d06d1a4f0704
Needed to do an http post instead of a get for one carrier.
Do this by putting an auto-submitting form in the data to be
interpreted as a html doc by the browser. The ACTION_VIEW
intent only works on http uri, but by specifying ACTION_MAIN/
CATEGORY_APP_BROWSER we could use data:text/html.
bug:11168810
Change-Id: Ifd33e1c3c7f9f40b6add39e446e6a7d7cde22549
