Fix up some comments in IPv6 tethering code.

Bug: 30298058
Change-Id: Icc99e772898b8303d8f2f8521784e2cb5c2afacc
This commit is contained in:
Erik Kline
2016-08-10 10:00:32 +09:00
parent c14748b366
commit d1dcbefe06
2 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ class IPv6TetheringInterfaceServices {
// We need to be able to send unicast RAs, and clients might
// like to ping the default router's link-local address. Note
// that we never remove the link-local route from the network
// until Tethering disables tethering on the interface.
// until Tethering disables tethering on the interface. We
// only need to add the link-local prefix once, but in the
// event we add it more than once netd silently ignores EEXIST.
addedPrefixes.add(LINK_LOCAL_PREFIX);
}
@ -177,7 +179,9 @@ class IPv6TetheringInterfaceServices {
final ArrayList<RouteInfo> toBeAdded = getLocalRoutesFor(addedPrefixes);
try {
// It's safe to call addInterfaceToLocalNetwork() even if
// the interface is already in the local_network.
// the interface is already in the local_network. Note also
// that adding routes that already exist does not cause an
// error (EEXIST is silently ignored).
mNMService.addInterfaceToLocalNetwork(mIfName, toBeAdded);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
Log.e(TAG, "Failed to add IPv6 routes to local table: ", e);

View File

@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ public class RouterAdvertisementDaemon {
for (Inet6Address dns : dnses) {
// NOTE: If the full of list DNS servers doesn't fit in the packet,
// this code will cause a buffer overflow and the RA won't include
// include this instance of the option at all.
// this instance of the option at all.
//
// TODO: Consider looking at ra.remaining() to determine how many
// DNS servers will fit, and adding only those.