59b1888bb9
Should be a little more clear. The internal IWindowSession implementation keeps the WindowlessWindowManager name, but the API section definitely needs a more usable name. Instead of passing in a root Surface we want it to be owned by the SurfaceControlViewHost itself. This way we can ensure we only return a SurfacePackage. In follow up CLs we will add an accessibility ID to the SurfacePackage so we can ensure the Control is passed around with the accessibility ID. Test: Builds Bug: 134365580 Change-Id: I30520e8b169d3744a66ccedf61cc4515cfef4dee
29 lines
1.1 KiB
XML
29 lines
1.1 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
|
|
<!-- Copyright (C) 2019 The Android Open Source Project
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
limitations under the License.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
<manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
|
|
package="com.android.test.viewembed">
|
|
|
|
<application>
|
|
<activity android:name="SurfaceControlViewHostTest" android:label="View Embedding Test">
|
|
<intent-filter>
|
|
<action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN"/>
|
|
<category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER"/>
|
|
</intent-filter>
|
|
</activity>
|
|
</application>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</manifest>
|