* commit '2aeaf2345ea0b72322ee301cb4412fa737b594bc':
For JB, the READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission is not enforced by default. It may be enforced by default in future releases. Developers have the option of enabling enforcement to test their application and some may begin to include this permission on applications. To avoid user confusion, the permission is placed in the development tools group.
Update long strings to provide users with more information about permissions.
* changes:
For JB, the READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission is not enforced by default. It may be enforced by default in future releases. Developers have the option of enabling enforcement to test their application and some may begin to include this permission on applications. To avoid user confusion, the permission is placed in the development tools group.
Update long strings to provide users with more information about permissions.
1. Since we added explicit accessibility focusable attribute when
adding focusables views that do so should call this method. Some
views were not updated to do so.
bug:6581924
Change-Id: Id64c0b2d76e5269ebf3fbe17203e73b174bdb843
* commit 'd070e3daa484a2265cb9fdb57af10d31bbb2e9f4':
Revert "Make the protectionLevel of framework permissions consistent and related to sensitive user data. Dangerous permissions are applied only where sensitive user data may be exposed."
This is just the initial state tracking. Still to go is
actually triggering Bluetooth A2DP correctly and tracking
process state in the system server.
Change-Id: I33031d52799d6e2d7208910da833831085cc3677
LayoutTransition runs changing animations on all objects that change between
now and the next layout. This works in most normal situations, but when a container
is becoming visible, or being added to its container, or other first-time situations,
then some of the views and parent hierarchy may be of size (0,0). The user really
shouldn't need to see an animation up from these nonsense values, so we just
skip running the animation on these objects and simply place the objects where they
need to go.
Issue #6597648 view should not animate up from size (0,0)
Change-Id: I2c355a68bf1ce3b41fbec01ad95c78d83562ba32
This provides the means to replace the assist icon shown in keyguard and the
navigation gesture for assist. It's done by adding metadata called
"com.android.systemui.action_assist_icon" to the activity that handles
android.intent.action.ASSIST. It should point to a StateListDrawable
in that package with the required states. For example:
<meta-data android:name="com.android.systemui.action_assist_icon"
android:resource="@drawable/ic_android_systemui_action_assist" />
And then something like this in drawable/ic_android_systemui_action_assist.xml :
<selector xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
<item android:state_enabled="true"
android:state_active="false"
android:state_focused="false"
android:drawable="@drawable/ic_action_assist_normal" />
<item android:state_enabled="true"
android:state_active="true"
android:state_focused="false"
android:drawable="@drawable/ic_action_assist_activated" />
<item android:state_enabled="true"
android:state_active="false"
android:state_focused="true"
android:drawable="@drawable/ic_action_assist_focused" />
</selector>
Change-Id: Ibc29360e179fed68253ff06a07b1bb2b982d0dab
1. The findAccessibilityNodeInfosByTextUiThread was reusing an ArrayList
instance also used by the logic to initialize an AccessibilityNodeInfo.
Hence, if the find method got some view and creates the infos for them
the method creating the info was reusing the same array list and was
nuking its contents.
bug:6556585
Change-Id: I1d013bf7b1f715f8b4c4ba60c677233bec40647c
Rather than caching the WebViewDatabaseClassic instance in a member,
grab the instance when we need it.
In the case of WebSyncManager - neither it or it's subclass uses
the WebViewDatabaseClassic (and it's subclass is final) so remove
it's initialisation. We must leave the member declared however
to satisfy the published API.
Bug: 6482144
Change-Id: Ibf5186a2851d17f5ad62b35ad543aeadff5618d9
1. Now the list traversal forward is the exact opposite
of the traversal backward.
2. The focus search starts from the view against which
the call is made as opposed to the one that has focus.
This is now consistent with the rest of the focus search.
bug:6537747
Change-Id: Ida6a696636a3099531155fcbff256f71264f5008