1. Delegating activation gestures has several issues that we should
decide how to handle if possible before allowing an accessibility
service to take over them:
A) It is needed that every view than can be clicked or long pressed on
reacts to such as a response to calling performClick and performLongPress
which is not necessary true since the view may watch the touch
events and do its own click long click detection. As a result it may
be possible that there are view a user cannot interact with in
touch exploration mode but can if not in that mode.
B) Clicking or long pressing on a different location in a view may yield
different results, for example NumberPicker. Ideally such views have
to implement AccessibilityNodeProvide which provider handles correctly
the request for click long press on virtual nodes. Some apps however
just fire different hover accessibility events when the user is over
a specific semantic portion of the view but do not provide virtual
nodes. Hence, a user will not be able to interact with such semantic
regions but the system can achieve that by sending the click/long click
at the precise location in the view that was last touch explored.
2. Adding a flag on accessibility service info to request explore by touch
mode. There is no need to put the device in this mode if node of the currently
enabled accessibility services supports it. Now the problem is inverted and
the service has to explicitly state its capability.
3. Fixing a bug where includeImportantViews was ignored for automation
services.
Change-Id: I3b29a19f24ab5e26ee29f974bbac2197614c9e2a
- Remove the notion of channel from an application perspective
- Remove the use of DnsSd as part of API and add a protocol type to allow
future extensions
- Use the listener object as a handler for stop and unregister operations. Also,
we now allow multiple active discovery operations.
- Remove init/deinit operations in favour of setting up construction
Bug:6434844
Change-Id: Id15521d571aac9c4053d81184ad66dfc54f636de
1. AccessibilityNodeInfos for visible views should always
be reported and the clients should be able to check
whether that node info is shown to the user. For example,
focus search may return a node that is not on the screen
and the accessibility layer may decide to give it focus
which scroll the source view in the screen.
bug:6421991
Change-Id: Idc1fd8512dda767abe802aacedb0c69582e6fc2a
1. Implementing text content navigation at various granularities.
For views that have content description but no text the
content description is the traversed at character and word
granularities. For views that inherit from TextView the
supported granularities are character, word, line, and page.
bug:5932640
Conflicts:
core/java/android/view/View.java
Conflicts:
core/java/android/view/View.java
Change-Id: I66d1e16ce9ac5d6b49f036b17c087b2a7075e4c0
Added bitmaps for permission group icons. We had to pick either
icons for a dark or light background, and it had to be light for
settings, so the installer theme has gone back to dark.
Tweaked the permission groups to match the icons.
Redid the group priorities to make them correct (they were written
with higher priorities being less important).
Fixed bug where priority was not being used for system apps.
Change-Id: Ia3d3f0c1614a11b4cfd11682ce9e6c9f87d75c06
