Also fix a little problem where the USER_STARTED broadcasts
were not being sent as ordered broadcasts(!).
Change-Id: I3aa3e0a9b3900967cdd2d115ee103371b0a50c41
FindBugs description:
There is an apparent recursive loop at IntProperty.java
in method set(Object, Integer)
This method unconditionally invokes itself. This would seem
to indicate an infinite recursive loop that will result in a stack overflow.
Note: Checked into AOSP. Cherry-picking for mr1.1.
Issue #7621806 IntProperty has infinite recursion bug
Change-Id: I2f52dd3689198cb948925aa65dd9c95be7888fe7
In alarm manager, print a summary of the top 10 alarms by time
being executed. Keep track of execution time (and wake count) of
each type of alarm for each application so this can be printed in
the summary (and used to compute the top 10 alarms). Rework how
the alarm summary stats are tracked so that we don't need to hold
on to the full Intent for each stat and can get the Intent information
at the time the alarm is sent rather than waiting for whatever Intent
comes back in the result.
Also in the battery stats: sort the kernel wake locks by time, add
a new section showing all partial wake locks across all applications
sorted by time.
Finally a new LocalLog class that is used by AlarmManager to log
important warning messages, so these can also be later found in
its dumpsys output.
Change-Id: Icc07810053e60fb623a49937e696819cb8352b06
ACQUIRE_CAUSES_WAKEUP is supposed to be ignored if combined with
PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK. Instead it was being carried out for any values
of the WakeLock level.
This change reverts behavior to closely match
previous releases of the framework by only honoring
ACQUIRE_CAUSES_WAKEUP for screen wake lock levels. The only
difference being that in previous releases ACQUIRE_ could have been
combined with PROXIMITY_SCREEN_OFF_WAKE_LOCK (it never was) and
now such a combination will ignore the ACQUIRE_ flag.
Bug 7532258 fixed.
Change-Id: I46e848d8fd1b57e54c63141bf3d4f353986b5bdf
* commit '1586168302f79d10e85a5aeed7b486c4244cc98e':
Revert "NumberPicker should adjust min and max when displayed values are set." (a.k.a. Santa is back)
* commit 'e9812bae0e0ce08bd232dc2371fdb959e4f7a318':
Revert "NumberPicker should adjust min and max when displayed values are set." (a.k.a. Santa is back)
This reverted change was adjusting the min and max values for the NumberPicker
which is not desirable since it changes behavior and it will be possible for
an app that works on the current platform to crash on an older one. Also the
adjustment was not implemented correctly.
Updated the documentation to clarify the reltionship between the min value,
max value, and the displayed values array.
Bug:7518172
This reverts commit a1410e6789ce72bc423793315a51aea8b6bad6c7
Change-Id: I109f1b1f54c1e609941243cabab9241871b6b12b
- When notifications vibrate as a fallback (that is,
because they want to play a sound but the device is in
vibrate mode), this no longer requires the VIBRATE
permission.
- As a bonus, if your notifications use DEFAULT_VIBRATE,
you don't need the VIBRATE permission either.
- If you specify a custom vibration pattern, you'll still
need the VIBRATE permission for that.
- Notifications vibrating in fallback mode use same
vibration pattern but can be changed easily in future.
- The DEFAULT_VIBRATE and fallback vibrate patterns are now
specified in config.xml.
Bug: 7531442
Change-Id: I7a2d8413d1becc53b9d31f0d1abbc2acc3f650c6
