The logic here was backwards, causing the (softer) fallback vibe
pattern to be applied if the notification specified a sound
(or DEFAULT_SOUND) and also DEFAULT_VIBRATE. The fallback
vibe should only play if you have *no* vibration set.
Bug: 7588655
Change-Id: Iecdd362729bccedf779b51cc9b90a12014328aff
When a DeviceAdmin requests a device wipe due to a number of incorrect
password attempts, only primary user can wipe the device. Secondary users
can only remove themselves from the device.
Bug: 7554445
Change-Id: I24331cb4eff37571fcd792abb2efc794f7b3f2d2
The root cause is we can't unbind blue service when bluetooth isnot disbaled
Otherwise the bluedroid stack will be out of sync with bluetooth service
only unbind bluetoothservice, when bluetooth is at OFF state.
bug 7376846
Change-Id: If5a11926f77a1ac29e75cdddbf5e90d492179f43
Rely on behavior of already-released CountDownLatch instead of
clearing the reference.
Bug: 7290521
Change-Id: I787e673b97d18be412d5b37e279fbf1275b49151
(This relates to the new vibration fallback behavior, where
notifications that expect to make a sound should always
vibrate in vibrate mode. We should not vibrate if the
notification's sound is silent, but we should also not
vibrate if the notification uses the default sound and the
default is silent.)
Bug: 7537077
Change-Id: I08e149c8c00ef2d2f61e418d88a086cb5e9cf241
- When notifications vibrate as a fallback (that is,
because they want to play a sound but the device is in
vibrate mode), this no longer requires the VIBRATE
permission.
- As a bonus, if your notifications use DEFAULT_VIBRATE,
you don't need the VIBRATE permission either.
- If you specify a custom vibration pattern, you'll still
need the VIBRATE permission for that.
- Notifications vibrating in fallback mode use a different
vibration pattern.
- The DEFAULT_VIBRATE and fallback vibrate patterns are now
specified in config.xml.
Bug: 7531442
Change-Id: I7a2d8413d1becc53b9d31f0d1abbc2acc3f650c6
LocationManagerService was serially stuffing the same Location into
multiple Intents, which it would immediately hand off to
ActivityManagerService, running as a different thread in the same
process. LocationManager would continue to work with that Location
while ActivityManagerService worked with a Parceled version of it.
However, Location.mExtras is also a Bundle, and both
ActivityManagerService and LocationManagerService ended up working
with references to the same Bundle. ActivityManagerService needs
it in Parceled form (ie mParceledData != null), but
LocationManagerService was triggering Bundle.unparcel() when
referencing the data contained within.
As a result, LocationManagerService was able to trigger NPE (or
worse) in ActivityManagerService by manipulating the mExtras
member of a Location that was in the process of being reported to
listeners.
To resolve this issue, I copy-construct a new Location to report to
each listener. This should prevent ActivityManagerService and
LocationManagerService from referencing the same Bundle data, as
Location's copy constructor also copyconstructs the mExtras member,
rather than simply share references.
Bug: 7518371
Change-Id: I1a92615cba361831494447d5de085a8d910b6b2c
the root cause is the A2dp and Pbap service need receive STATE_TURNING_OFF intent
to shutdown cleanly. So we need send completely state transition intents
in user switch handler.
bug7403171
Change-Id: Ic92bc85c2b74ae7c95440b237ea8851771ee9f04
(Unless the notification specifies no ringtone AND no
vibration, in which case it will remain silent.)
Change-Id: I926d0fe0165b9622cd117e6c3ef6e3637772b444
Omits service name from destroyed events, since it can be derived by
looking back to the created event with the same ServiceRecord.
Change-Id: Ib7ab1031c0859437735e1fc985d58f47629b7ac4
