These extras will be used in ManagedProvisioning to allow
Bluetooth connections from provisioned devices.
Change-Id: I7118acd4ea71e2028a0c9f0c61031c78deef8908
There is the case that adjustSurface() get called even if
the size of the surface of DimLayer is not changed actually.
Since changing the size of a surface is processed synchronously
in the SurfacFlinger, there is usually a few milliseconds delay
(up to 1 vsync interval) when we launch an application.
This patch avoids such cases.
Change-Id: Ib1f76d54f9f2364ac54b70120e4b781e8534e750
Signed-off-by: Dohyun Lee <dohyun.lee@lge.com>
This will eventually allow us to have a single unified filesystem
instead of requiring zygote to use bind mounts.
Change-Id: I29b819ab51498b4bab874e0367b1ab4165f84025
Before all permissions were granted at install time at once, so the user
was persented with an all or nothing choice. In the new runtime permissions
model all dangarous permissions (nomal are always granted and signature
one are granted if signatures match) are not granted at install time and
the app can request them as necessary at runtime.
Before, all granted permission to an app were identical for all users as
granting is performed at install time. However, the new runtime model
allows the same app running under two different users to have different
runtime permission grants. This change refactors the permissions book
keeping in the package manager to enable per user permission tracking.
The change also adds the app facing APIs for requesting runtime permissions.
Change-Id: Icbf2fc2ced15c42ca206c335996206bd1a4a4be5
The original logic would let the app hidden by keyguard be able to
decide the orientation. While going back from a show-when-locked app
to keyguard, there would be a short time that keyguard is unable to
decide the orientation, which causes WMS uses the wrong orientation
from the wrong app.
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=155640
Change-Id: Ibc17bfe4603f68b241dc7380459ec9de42a3e259
The restored set of enabled IMEs/subtypes is merged into the
current state of the system, rather than simply replacing it.
This is because we do not want to accidentally disable or
reconfigure something that the user is currently relying on.
There's a certain amount of repetitive activity here, rebuilding
the enabled-state data structures in a different format, but it's
important for maintainability that the restore code be able to
rely on the core InputMethodUtils implementation of reading/writing
the settings element.
Bug 19822542
Change-Id: If0104151b3526da6ecc669adde3119a239ecafeb
