1. We use a delayed callback to throttle the amount of accessibility
scroll events fired by the view tree. The callback to do so was
not properly reset when removed putting the view tree in a bad
state resulting in no scroll events being fired at all.
bug:6549005
Change-Id: Ibf72d7e009e4545a336c9471f46015910290703e
1. This attribute specifies whether a view can take accessibility
focus. It has three values: 1) auto - the system determines
based on whether the view is actionable and has actionable
predecessor. Accessibility services can put accessibility focus
on such a node at will; 2) yes ; this view always takes access
focus; 3) no - the view cannot takes accessibility focus and
accessibility services cannot put accessibility focus on it.
Change-Id: I2ebf4e7c75bf6b39e1742b6868b37ccdd4cc7d28
1. Iterators were skipping content on reversing direction.
2. The cursor was positioned at the beginning of the next text segment
when moving forward and at end of the previous text segment when moving
backwards. This is incorrect and now the cursor is positioned at the
end of the segment when moving forward and at the beginning when moving
backward.
3. The cursor position was not properly set when reaching the end/start
of the text.
4. The iterators were reporting strictly the next/previous segment even
if the cursor is within such a segment. Thus, when traversing some
content may be skipped. Now moving forward moves the selection to
the next segment end and the start position is either the old index
if it was within a segment or the start of the segment. Same in
reverse.
bug:6575099
Change-Id: Ib48a649cec53910339baf831a75e26440be6e576
...content provider and updating its oom adj
This introduces the concept of an "unstable" reference on a content
provider. When holding such a reference (and no normal stable ref),
the content provider dying will not cause the client process to be
killed.
This is used in ContentResolver.query(), .openAssetFileDescriptor(),
and .openTypedAssetFileDescriptor() to first access the provider
with an unstable reference, and if at the point of calling into the
provider we find it is dead then acquiring a new stable reference
and doing the operation again. Thus if the provider process dies
at any point until we get the result back, our own process will not
be killed and we can safely retry the operation.
Arguably there is still the potential for a race -- if somehow the
provider is killed way late by the OOM killer after the query or
open has returned -- but this should now be *extremely* unlikely.
We also continue to have the issue with the other calls, but these
are much less critical, and the same model can't be used there (we
wouldn't want to execute two insert operations for example).
The implementation of this required some significant changes to the
underlying plumbing of content providers, now keeping track of the
two different reference counts, and managing them appropriately. To
facilitate this, the activity manager now has a formal connection
object for a client reference on a content provider, which hands to
the application when opening the provider.
These changes have allowed a lot of the code to be cleaned up and
subtle issues closed. For example, when a process is crashing, we
now have a much better idea of the state of content provider clients
(olding a stable ref, unstable ref, or waiting for it to launch), so
that we can correctly handle each of these.
The client side code is also a fair amount cleaner, though in the
future there is more than should be done. In particular, the two
ProviderClientRecord and ProviderRefCount classes should be combined
into one, part of which is exposed to the ContentResolver internal
API as a reference on a content provider with methods for updating
reference counts and such. Some day we'll do that.
Change-Id: I87b10d1b67573ab899e09ca428f1b556fd669c8c
Make clearer how the platform is handling key events following some
unfortunate uses by third party applications. Also highlight the
changes in Jelly Bean default keyboard.
Bug: 6566711
Change-Id: Ibcdaf54c6d629fd0733529bfe2fffc82f555f084
Bug 6476578
The latest bug report show a query.length() of 33 while
mQueryTextView.length() is 0 on line 514.
I can see 2 reasons which can explain this discrepancy:
- the mQueryTextView has a filter, which alters the text.
- some asynchronous event (IME?) changes the text in the mean time.
I would favor the second one, which seems to break a lot of single
thread assumptions in the code and generates other IOOB exceptions.
Note that depending on what they are used for, it may be more consistent
to use mQueryTextView.getText() instead of query in the following
assignment.
Change-Id: Ie8a5486b11a80543f8f90980454933c5a74c073e
Unhide the following methods:
android.app.KeyguardManager.isKeyguardLocked()
android.app.KeyguardManager.isKeyguardSecure()
Fix some javadoc typos
Change-Id: Iedcd9f6a5261b7a3b47431edff013f629e1dc45d
Loop is trigger by a seek to 0 when ended on native side but there is no play
call. So on java side, we detect this and call into native side to trigger a
play after completion.
This fixed the UI problem and keep in sync with the native mode.
Beyond that, we don't need to reload for looping and we don't have the seek
to play artifacts.
bug:5461143
webkit change:
https://android-git.corp.google.com/g/#/c/193750/
Change-Id: I779f3e1fbc789832a1a99d1f17823db6b57b35df
Bug #6555840
Apps like Google+ with large bitmaps displayed in listivews could
run into memory issues because of these references.
Change-Id: I39486bda13ce00c5a3b6481139ad54547506a8b4
Bug 5993716
Use setCustomSelectActionModeCallback rather than
setLongClickListener to disallow custom action block so
that long press can bring up the paste window.
Change-Id: I916e77dcea7914c02191f0ecda37cd126318807d
Add a setting on WebViewCore to control whether we monitor
the responsiveness of the WebCore thread. Default is not
to monitor.
Bug: 6447214
Change-Id: Ia95e5c769d458dcd24ae50660b2f22e93851956f
are pending
Save the pending position scroll until the data change is actually
serviced before posting it to run. This avoids handler loops on
GONE subtrees or when the view is detached.
Bug 6547649
Change-Id: Iab108cfcb7dd11ece703762d311a5f5985f38c3b
- use an ID instead of a String for StorageVolume description
- use this ID for getting the correct localized version of the description string
Change-Id: I30f3080fce2c889be38bfdf9f5121dffcf8a99e8
1. ActivityChooserView did not hide the popup window when detached.
bug:6544220
2. ActivityChooserView was calling show popup when it was already
showing it resulting in an incrrect update and losing one item
per rotation.
bug:6522041
Change-Id: Iec1682ca5d27e38caf57214fa86060edf82a2166
LayoutTransition causes artifacts in some situations where a window is just
becoming visible or a container is just being added to the view tree when animations
are kicked off in LayoutTransition due to the normal automatic mechanism of running
animations when views are added/removed/etc. The problem is that containers in these
situations may have children with positions and sizes of (0, 0), causing the animation to
animate from this default/nonsense value to whatever is appropriate for the views when
they are first laid out and drawn. The end result is correct, but the animation is
superfluous and silly.
The fix is to avoid running any kind of transition animation on windows that are not
currently visible or containers that are not currently atached to the view hierarchy.
This should avoid the situation by only allowing the animations to run after the containers
and windows are visible and set up correctly.
Issue #6544410 issue with layout transition when first showing the activity
Change-Id: I737b2598887ef806dec3b02a483a8e8ff2c3d4e2
Delaying the popup by using removeView instead of removeViewImmediate
caused an error when the removal was actually executed after the parent
window was deleted along with the popup.
Fixes bug 6407801.
Change-Id: Ieb17d58467aaf16e1a24f47187f52766d694ba32
