1. Every accessibility services targeting JellyBean or higher has
to request a special permission for the system to bind to it.
Change-Id: I6e579326bdf3597f148d6c67317455701ec8af68
...FragmentManagerImpl.restoreAllState
This was a bug related to the difference between the pre- and post-HC
behavior of onSaveInstanceState(). Prior to HC, state was saved
before calling onPause(). Starting with HC, it is saved between
onPause() and onStop(). To maintain compatibility with existing
applications, there is a check in ActivityThread for pre-HC to in
that case emulate the behavior of old applications, still calling
onSaveInstanceState() before onPause() but using the state later.
One of the special cases we had to deal with in the old model of
saving state before pausing was restarting an activity that is
already paused.
Consider, for example: you have two activities on screen, the one on
top not fullscreen so you can see the one behind. The top activity
is resumed, the behind activity is paused. In the pre-HC world, the
behind activity would have already had its state saved.
Now you rotate the screen, and we need to restart the activities.
We need to destroy the behind activity and create a new instance,
but the new instance has to end up in the paused state. To
accompish this, we restart it with a flag saying that it should
end up paused. For the pre-HC world, since it ends up paused,
we need to make sure we still have its instance state kept around
in case we need it because we can't regenerate it (since it is
already paused).
So that is what the changed code here is doing. It goes through
the normal create/start/resume steps, but holds on to the current
saved state so that it isn't lost when resume clears it, and then
puts the activity back to paused and stuffs that old saved state
back in to it.
The problem is that this code was doing it for every application,
even HC apps. So we end up in a bad state, when a HC app has its
saved state sitting there as if it had been saved, even though it
is only paused. Now if we go to restart the activity again, instead
of asking it for a new saved state (as we should for a HC app as
part of stopping it), we just re-use the existing saved state again.
Now this wouldn't generally be a huge problem. Worst case, when we
restart the activity yet again we are just instantiating it from
the same saved state as we used last time, dropping whatever changes
may have happened in-between. Who cares? All it has been doing is
sitting there in the background, visible to the user, but not something
they can interact with. If the activity made changes to its
fragments, those changes will be lost, and we will restore it from
the older state.
However... if one of those fragements is a retained fragment, this
will *not* appear in the saved state, but actually be retained across
each activity instance. And now we have a problem: if the retained
fragments are changed during this time, the next activity instance
will be created from the most recent state for the retained fragments,
but the older state for everyting else. If these are inconsistent...
wham, dead app.
To fix this, just don't keep the saved state for HC apps.
Also includes a small optimization to ActivityStack to not push
the home screen to the front redundantly.
Change-Id: Ic3900b12940de25cdd7c5fb9a2a28fb1f4c6cd1a
1. Added support for accessibility scroll action to
some widgets that are scrollable.
2. Making the super call when handling an accessibility
action in the views to call super first to allow
an accessibility delegate to intercept the call.
bug:5932640
Change-Id: I5eb37d64bf9fba1d5c596981132e0df717e2a18a
1. Finished the implementation of support for maintaining
accessibility focus in view with virtual descendants.
2. Finished the NumberPicker implementation of virtual
subtree such that all requred attributes are reported
and ensuring that it support accessibility focus in
its virtual descentants.
3. Fixed a bug where if a predecessor of the view that is
accessiiblity focused is removed the accessibliity focus
host in ViewRootImpl is not cleared leading to a crash
when trying to draw the accessibility focus highlight.:
bug:6472646
bug:6433864
Change-Id: I3645642b87b4a26025c0b2ba9dfaad92d11a48f1
When sending CHOOSER intent, inspect its target for any EXTRA_STREAM
needing migration. If any migration happens, copy the ClipData to
the CHOOSER intent and set GRANT_READ flag. Also update CHOOSER docs.
Bug: 6463773
Change-Id: I66a7adf7bf6f2f173866925cb7e048f4c7a63222
...while listening to TTS example
This was a nice one. What was happening is that immediately upon
being created, the activity was starting another activity in a
different process. The second activity would never show, just
immediately exit. However the original activity had time to
pause and get into stopping itself before the second activity had
come back to the activity manager to say it was going away, resulting
in the activity manager asking the original activity to resume.
At this point the activity manager's state is that the second
activity is finishing and gone, and the original activity is
resumed. However in the app process the original activity is
still working on stopping itself, and it eventually completes
this and tells the activity manager. The activity manager now
changes its state to STOPPED, even though it is actually resumed
and that is the last thing it told it to be, and it is now
proceeding to set itself in that state.
This would result later in the activity manager sending an
unnecessary state change to the application. In the case of
the screen here, we next do a rotation change, the activity
manager thinks the current state is STOPPED not RESUMED, so it
tells the application to relaunch the activity in a new config
but not in the resumed state. Now it does the whole "start a
new temporary activity" thing again, at which point it tries
to pause the original activity again, and we have an unbalanced
onPause() call to the app and it falls over.
Change-Id: I38b680746f4c61ae30e7ce831e1de187adf60902
Automatically create a submenu for items with ActionProviders that
provide a submenu when the item was not initially configured to have
one.
Bug 6493376
Change-Id: I27218e2ab205e87534f235eb04042b185d99d143
1. Now the views considered during the accessibility focus search
are the ones that would get accessibility focus when thovered
over. This way the user will get the same items i.e. feedback
if he touch explores the screen and uses focus traversal. This
is imperative for a good user experience.
2. Updated which focusables are considered when searching for access
focus in ViewGroup. Generally accessibility focus ignores focus
before/after descendants.
3. Implemented focus search strategy in AbsListView that will traverse
the items of the current list (and the stuff withing one item
before moving to the next) before continuing the search if
forward and backward accessibility focus direction.
4. View focus search stops at root namespace. This is not the right
way to prevent some stuff that is not supposed to get a focus in
a container for a specific state. Actually the addFocusables
for that container has to be overriden. Further this approach
leads to focus getting stuck. The accessibility focus ignores
root names space since we want to traverse the entire screen.
5. Fixed an bug in AccessibilityInteractionController which was not
starting to search from the root of a virtual node tree.
6. Fixed a couple of bugs in FocusFinder where it was possible to
get index out of bounds exception if the focusables list is empty.
bug:5932640
Change-Id: Ic3bdd11767a7d40fbb21f35dcd79a4746af784d4
Whenever a stream type is muted, the progress bar in volume panel
is at 0.
If a stream is muted by ringer mode and does not control ringer mode,
the progress bar is disabled.
Pressing VOL- when in vibrate or silent mode resets the last audible
volume of ringtone stream (music strem on tablets) to 0.
VolumePanel implementation:
- Always prefer AudioManager APIs over AudioService APIs when available on both.
- Do not use AudioManager.shouldVibrate() (deprecated).
Change-Id: I57fcb19ada4e8d729b6b41d668496562ebe340c3
Bug 6404882.
The supplied code in this bug sets up a table with 2 columns and then
tries to add a component in column 5. Earlier attempts to fix this
by 'doing what the user meeant' had unwanted side-effects. This CL is
intended to defend against all ways to register invalid LayoutParams
and throw IllegalArgumentExcpetion when any column index falls outside the
range [0 .. N] where N is the number of columns. It also includes the
symmetrical check for rows.
Change-Id: I958a6d16035889cd954b78108773426e8b6b6d95
Bug 5859620
Simplify text selection to use left/right rather than
base/extent. In combination with webkit change, this
fixes RTL selection. The handle directions are properly-
facing when the text direction is the same for both
sides of selection.
Webkit Change: I3362c5034ce08ce1517a86882c13b78aff35fe3f
Change-Id: Ib88ed2327182ba5b47b3e41584cbe944d05c8ada
The window manager now performs the crop internally, evaluating
it every animation from, to be able to update it along with
the surface position.
Change-Id: I960a2161b9defb6fba4840fa35aee4e411c39b32
1. The initial design was to have some accessibility gestures
being handled by the system if the gesture handling access
service does not consume the gesture. However, we are not
sure what a good default is and once we add a default handler
we cannot remove it since people may rely on it. Thus, we
take the simples approach and let the accessibility service
handle the gestures. If no gestures are handled the system
will work in explore by touch as before.
bug:5932640
Change-Id: I865a83549fa03b0141d27ce9713e9b7bb45a57b4
SurfaceView didn't recompute the transparent region
when the INVISIBLE state (as opposed to GONE) was involved.
Bug: 6467123
Change-Id: I05930bd568a345331840c1ad8d9123ef4904c04f
* moved View#isVisibleToUser to protected with @hide
* added a new View#isVisibleToUser(Rect), so that a portion of
the view can be tested for visibility
* NumberPicker will report its concrete class name
* code to append virtual children was at wrong place
* boundInScreen for increment and decrement buttons are reported
wrong
Change-Id: Ic5d644b3e1efa15b1f0537907c8cdd4ce43a97c1
This fixes a problem where the bounds of the view weren't being
calculated properly when a separate outer radius was specified.
The code now takes the maximum of the ring drawable's width/height
and that specified in the resource files.
This gives it the best default look on all devices while still
allowing minor tweaks.
Change-Id: I5daa40ff4f14653c8cc89b39102816afb976e4f7
