Mostly consists of removing the word "encryption" from most APIs,
since we can't actually make promises about the data being encrypted.
Bug: 27531029
Change-Id: Iace9d7c4e64716abf86ed11847c40f3947e1d625
Add granular StorageManager APIs for key creation/destruction and
unlocking/locking. Start passing through an opaque token as part
of the unlock command, but leave it empty for now. We now have a
separate "prepare" method that sanity checks that user directories
are correctly setup.
Define a handful of system properties used for marking devices that
should be operating in FBE mode, and if they're emulating FBE. Wire
a command to "sm", but persisting will come later.
Start using new "encryptionAware" flag on apps previously marked with
coreApp flag, which were apps running in the legacy CryptKeeper
model. Small tweaks to handle non-encryptionAware voice interaction
services. Switch PackageManager to consult StorageManager about the
unlocked state of a user.
Bug: 22358539
Change-Id: Ic2865f9b81c10ea39369c441422f7427a3c3c3d6
ActivityThread.currentPackageName() was actually returning
the process name. Change this to return the package name, and
fix the one spot using it I could find that was actually wanting
the process name.
Change-Id: I323b9c5987106b5a090968e545281fc0ba55b6b8
Split WindowManagerImpl into two parts, the WindowManager
interface implementation remains where it is but the global
communications with the window manager are now handled by
the WindowManagerGlobal class. This change greatly simplifies
the challenge of having separate WindowManager instances
for each Context.
Removed WindowManagerImpl.getDefault(). This represents the
bulk of this change. Most of the usages of this method were
either to perform global functions (now handled by WindowManagerGlobal)
or to obtain the default display (now handled by DisplayManager).
Explicitly associate each new window with a display and make
the Display object available to the View hierarchy.
Add stubs for some new display manager API features.
Start to split apart the concepts of display id and layer stack.
since they operate at different layers of abstraction.
While it's true that each logical display uniquely corresponds to a
surface flinger layer stack, it is not necessarily the case that
they must use the same ids. Added Display.getLayerStack()
and started using it in places where it was relatively easy to do.
Change-Id: I29ed909114dec86807c4d3a5059c3fa0358bea61
Except it does nothing.
But eat resources.
Yum, yum!
Current we create five processes. The main process sucks up 16MB of
RAM and creates a full-screen window; only on high-end devices does
the window (and process) use the GPU.
The second through fourth processes just sits there not really doing
anything except using process overhead.
The fifth process runs a background service, slowing eating RAM until
it gets killed by the system (as the system will ultimately do with
background services). It also creates a full-screen window, and always
uses the GPU even on low-end devices.
Change-Id: Ibe9e25f7dbd889f4dc83eed6a3c09b9b0437b4e3
