Switch from a global mLayoutNeeded to one for each Display so that
we don't run layout on Displays that haven't changed.
Change-Id: Ib65c5c667933cceacc46b94f4e6e6bd613d5cb35
broadcast asks to run as user -1 but is calling from user 0; this requires
Also improve part of issue #7087789: Local denial of service via
low-permissioned apps
No longer allow closeSystemDialogs() from background processes.
Change-Id: I752d5a1d51be0b69fde6999d6659835e5bde3efe
New API to register as an explicit user, which allows you to
also select ALL to see broadcasts for all users.
New BroadcastReceiver API to find out which user the broadcast
was sent to.
Use this in app widget service to handle per-user package broadcasts
and boot completed broadcasts correctly.
Change-Id: Ibbe28993bd4aa93900c79e412026c27863019eb8
The WindowAnimator loop over each Display contained actions that
only needed to be done one time but were instead done once per loop.
Change-Id: Ia916b08cdb7670686e6295dbcef6a5ff27474099
The inner loop that ran over each display had a few problems:
- The Surface transaction was starting and stopping between each
display.
- The layout change bits were being applied globally so all
displays were layed out when only individual displays needed to be.
- Wallpaper and input actions were being applied each time through
the display loop rather than once only for the default display.
Change-Id: I924252bab28c426222a4bb73693accc4b21cecbe
- Refactor DragState to take Display instead of DisplayContent.
- Rename xxxAnimationLw methods in WindowManagerPolicy to xxxPostLayout
to reflect animation refactoring.
Change-Id: I502f2aa45a699ad395a249a12abf9843294623f0
Added more complete support for logical displays with
support for mirroring, rotation and scaling.
Improved the overlay display adapter's touch interactions.
A big change here is that the display manager no longer relies
on a single-threaded model to maintain its synchronization
invariants. Unfortunately we had to change this so as to play
nice with the fact that the window manager wants to own
the surface flinger transaction around display and surface
manipulations. As a result, the display manager has to be able
to update displays from the context of any thread.
It would be nice to make this process more cooperative.
There are already several components competing to perform
surface flinger transactions including the window manager,
display manager, electron beam, overlay display window,
and mouse pointer. They are not manipulating the same surfaces
but they can collide with one another when they make global
changes to the displays.
Change-Id: I04f448594241f2004f6f3d1a81ccd12c566bf296
Environment.getUserSystemDirectory(int userId)
Use it all relevant places that was hardcoding it.
Also, wipe out the user's system directory when user is removed, otherwise old state
might be transferred to a new user.
Change-Id: I788ce9c4cf9624229e65efa7047bc0c019ccef0a
Replaced all remaining places that used it with explicit user
specification.
While doing this, I ran into stuff that was creating PendingIntent
objects (that now need to specify the explicit user they are for),
which are also posting notifications... but have no way to specify
the user for the notification.
So the notification manager in the system process now also gets a
formal concept of a user associated with the notification, which
is passed in to all the necessary aidl calls. I also removed the
old deprecated aidl interface for posting/cancelling notifications,
since we now always need a user supplied.
There is more work that needs to be done here, though. For example
I think we need to be able to specify USER_ALL for a notification that
should be shown to all users (such as low storage or low battery).
Along with that, the PendingIntent creation needs to be tweaked to
be able to handle USER_CURRENT by evaluating the user at the point the
pending intent is sent.
That's for another change, however.
Change-Id: I468e14dce8def0e13e0870571e7c31ed32b6310c
Send the Intent.ACTION_PACKAGE_VERIFIED to all verifiers when
verification is complete (either one verifier verified the package or a
timeout occurred). Details of what occurred is in a new extra,
PackageManager.EXTRA_VERIFICATION_RESULT.
Bug: 7048930
Change-Id: I4f9855a29b0eb6d77f469891402c69e2e8922945
