Merge "Closing cursor in finalizer to avoid GREF and fd leak in acore"

core/java/android/content/ContentResolver.java

@@ -1398,9 +1398,11 @@ public abstract class ContentResolver {
 
         @Override
         protected void finalize() throws Throwable {
+            // TODO: integrate CloseGuard support.
             try {
                 if(!mCloseFlag) {
-                    ContentResolver.this.releaseProvider(mContentProvider);
+                    Log.w(TAG, "Cursor finalized without prior close()");
+                    close();
                 }
             } finally {
                 super.finalize();

core/tests/coretests/src/android/content/ContentResolverTest.java

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 The Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package android.content;
+
+import android.content.ContentResolver;
+import android.provider.ContactsContract;
+import android.test.AndroidTestCase;
+import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.LargeTest;
+
+public class ContentResolverTest extends AndroidTestCase {
+    private ContentResolver mContentResolver;
+
+    @Override
+    protected void setUp() throws Exception {
+        super.setUp();
+        mContentResolver = mContext.getContentResolver();
+    }
+
+    @LargeTest
+    public void testCursorFinalizer() throws Exception {
+        // TODO: Want a test case that more predictably reproduce this issue. Selected
+        // 600 as this causes the problem 100% of the runs on current hw, it might not
+        // do so on some other configuration though.
+        for (int i = 0; i < 600; i++) {
+            mContentResolver.query(ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI, null, null, null, null);
+        }
+    }
+}